Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:

Sounds like we need more documentation detailing the election process and what 
expected behavior is. Flavio perhaps you could
create a JIRA for that and start collecting this type of information? In 
particular you could link to jiras of this type, with the intent
of general documentation, including detail about these specific types of 

> Leader election selected incorrect leader
> -----------------------------------------
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-917
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: leaderElection, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>         Environment: Cloudera distribution of zookeeper (patched to never 
> cache DNS entries)
> Debian lenny
>            Reporter: Alexandre Hardy
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.3.3, 3.4.0
>         Attachments: zklogs-20101102144159SAST.tar.gz
> We had three nodes running zookeeper:
>   *
>   *
>   *
> failed, and was replaced by a new node 
> (automated startup). The new node had not participated in any zookeeper 
> quorum previously. The node was permanently removed from 
> service and could not contribute to the quorum any further (powered off).
> DNS entries were updated for the new node to allow all the zookeeper servers 
> to find the new node.
> The new node was selected as the LEADER, despite the fact that 
> it had not seen the latest zxid.
> This particular problem has not been verified with later versions of 
> zookeeper, and no attempt has been made to reproduce this problem as yet.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to