[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933018#action_12933018
 ] 

Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-925:
----------------------------------------

@Alex looks good to me. We're new with mvn based site gen, what's the 
implications on our side of adding a site.vm file? Is that not something we can 
specify with site.xml?

> Consider maven site generation to replace our forrest site and documentation 
> generation
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-925
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-925
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: documentation
>            Reporter: Patrick Hunt
>            Assignee: Patrick Hunt
>         Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-925.patch
>
>
> See WHIRR-19 for some background.
> In whirr we looked at a number of site/doc generation facilities. In the end 
> Maven site generation plugin turned out to be by far the best option. You can 
> see our nascent site here (no attempt at styling,etc so far):
> http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/
> In particular take a look at the quick start:
> http://incubator.apache.org/whirr/quick-start-guide.html
> which was generated from
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/whirr/trunk/src/site/confluence/quick-start-guide.confluence
> notice this was standard wiki markup (confluence wiki markup, same as 
> available from apache)
> You can read more about mvn site plugin here:
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-site.html
> Notice that other formats are available, not just confluence markup, also 
> note that you can use different markup formats if you like in the same site 
> (although probably not a great idea, but in some cases might be handy, for 
> example whirr uses the confluence wiki, so we can pretty much copy/paste 
> source docs from wiki to our site (svn) if we like)
> Re maven vs our current ant based build. It's probably a good idea for us to 
> move the build to maven at some point. We could initially move just the doc 
> generation, and then incrementally move functionality from build.xml to mvn 
> over a longer time period.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to