[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933045#action_12933045
 ] 

Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-934:
--------------------------------------------

It sounds like we need to do it so that we don't get affected by port scanners 
or monitoring systems. However, I'm not sure if this impacts the observers 
feature we are discussing in the other jira (ZOOKEEPER-933). It sounds like it 
does, but I need to verify. Any thoughts?



> Add sanity check for server ID
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-934
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-934
>             Project: Zookeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Vishal K
>             Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>
> 2. Should I add a check to reject connections from peers that are not
> listed in the configuration file? Currently, we are not doing any
> sanity check for server IDs. I think this might fix ZOOKEEPER-851.
> The fix is simple. However, I am not sure if anyone in community
> is relying on this ability.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to