On May 8, 2005, at 23:58, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
1.) It implements different behavior than CMF HEAD

2.) It breaks backwards compatibility


I propose to use the code from HEAD and the _getViewFor code as fallback in case no '(Default)' alias is defined.



Yes, it's true. I didn't even look at CVS HEAD, I applied a "recipe" I had used for a different CMF-based software product a little while ago. I'll clean it up over the next couple days.

OK, cleanup done. Works like CVS HEAD and falls back to utils._getViewFor in case there is a problem.


jens

_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to