Seb Bacon wrote:
As to your notes on the wiki: * Zope3 style interfaces: this is fairly uncontroversial and not too painful * Movement of presentation logic into Views gives us potentially great wins
Five provides a smooth migration path for both migration tasks: CMF 1.5.2 already ships with many Zope3 style interfaces and mixing skins and views seems to work fine.
* However, are you / we confident that we've found the best patterns for utilities / adapters yet? I'm not!
Maybe we should first see what people want to contribute and decide later if we call it CMF 1.6 or 2.0.
In addition, I have a number of more ambitious thoughts about the CMF, which don't necessarily relate to Zope3 - relating, for example, to schema-driven development,
You can use schema-based Five content with CMF 1.5.2.
or XML in the presentation layerl.
Not sure what you mean exactly by that. Cheers, Yuppie _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests