Tres, Is there anything needed on our end to get them "cleared for access"? I can assist moving that along if so.
Andrew -- Zope Managed Hosting Software Engineer Zope Corporation (540) 361-1700 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:zope-cmf- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tres Seaver > Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 10:04 AM > To: Florent Guillaume > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Zope-CMF] CMF 1.5.3 beta? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Florent Guillaume wrote: > > Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >>Because the Plone guys are trying to release a 2.1RC at OSCOM, and > >>because it would be sensible for them to use the fixes made since 1.5.2 > >>to the 1.5 branch, I'm wondering if we should be tagging a beta of > 1.5.3. > >> > >>Any objections? I may or may not get around to making a release for it. > > > > No objection. I'll slip in a few changes to reindexObjectSecurity today > > too probably. > > > > However I'd like to urge the "Plone guys" (95% of which don't bother to > > read or post in this list) to move their collective butts and actually > > implement forward-compatibility in Plone itself rather that, once more, > > tying the release of a base software to their own schedule. > > I've been working on getting more of them focused on the maintenance of > CMF: Andy McKay, Geoff Davis, and Alec Mitchell each have fixes they > want to land as soon as they get cleared for SVN access. > > > We have been doing it in CPS for a while, in a "CPSCompat" product. It's > > very easy, this is python, we can monkey-patch everything we need. > > The problem with that approach is that it introduces the risk that > bugfixes never make it back to the underlying product, because nobody > has the incentive (beyond good intentions) to land them. <span > class="ironic">Of course, nobody would actually succumb to that > temptation.</span> > > > See for instance the state we had before CMF 1.5.2 was released: > > http://svn.nuxeo.org/trac/pub/browser/CPSCompat/trunk/?rev=24873 > > These changes have become irrelevant now that CMF 1.5.2 is out, so the > > current code doesn't have them anymore. And I haven't forced anyone to > > release any other software just because I needed a new version of CPS > > out there. > > I learned this morning that the Plone 2.1 RC went out (I am told) with > CMF 1.5.2. The really crucial fix for them (making the pathwalk in > DirectoryView less painfully slow) only really affects people running > from SVN checkouts; OTOH, SVN is the only way to get the RC. > > > Tres. > - -- > =================================================================== > Tres Seaver +1 202-558-7113 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFC7ivt+gerLs4ltQ4RAuqAAKDXbZV6QZV7ZNc/dBBLg2XYDmPyfgCaA8S/ > hVNeCzj+9gyOcacLkq37G7s= > =gx8q > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf > > See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests