Sidnei da Silva wrote: >On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 02:36:21PM +0200, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote: >| >Still, the place to add indirection would be 'getToolByName'. As Tres >| >said above, let's not invent another component architecture. >| >| I agree that the correct of doing it is through the equivalent of a >| getUtility(IToolInterface, name=''), but there is a need for this now. > >Why can't we make it so then? > > > Yes, I agree this is the best way, but will this be in CMF1.5 or CMF2.0? It is mostly a matter of being pragmatic at this stage.
>| the _getWorkflowTool() hook was accepted by the way. Why is this different?? > >I wouldn't say it was accepted, just overlooked. > > then there is a list of hooks that can be migrated to the new getToolByName() when it materializes. At least this shows the need for named utilities in CMF. regards /JM _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests