On 21 Nov 2005, at 16:00, Julien Anguenot wrote:
yup you're right. We do define this already. All the subscribers
'async' or 'sync' . Check the base interface for those subscribers
Not quite the semantics I had in mind, I meant more of a "flush"-type
If you want a flush, following what I think I understood you
mean ;), we
use the transaction.commit() in the tests when needed.
Actually for our Trees Tool, there's also a flushEvents() method.
It's trivial to implement.
If there's interest in having that on Zope then of course we could
discuss and see what can be improved based on our . If not, we are
happy about this ourselves on CPS ;) It really enhances the
on large scaled projects. (especially the ones with several k
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests