On 3 Feb 2006, at 01:52, Rob Miller wrote:

On Fri, 03 Feb 2006 00:38:07 +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:

On 3 Feb 2006, at 00:31, Rob Miller wrote:
I mean sticking Plone-only stuff onto something that's a simple user
folder and should be completely agnostic of how it is used.

oh, i see. did i imply that Plone-only behaviour should be dropped into
the CMF?  i'm not detecting some prejudice that might possibly be
causing certain readers to jump to conclusions about my proposal, am i?

Did I say CMF? No, I did not. I said PAS.

whatever. i still don't think that justifies a back-handed insult when
there was nothing in my proposal that implied that i wanted to move
inappropriate behaviour anywhere into the stack. or maybe i should just be prepared for random snide comments to be the response to every future
proposal, since i happen to have come from the Plone community?

I don't see how a simple admonition to keep PAS itself usage-agnostic is supposed to be an insult. I only want to prevent all kinds of strange convenience APIs to appear on it which the current Plone versions expect on the user folder, things like "getLocalRolesForDisplay" or "isLocalRoleAcquired".


Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to