-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2007, at 01:19, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>> Right now I would let all existing CMF tools implement that interface,
>>> so we would be on the safe side. In a later release we can revisit
>>> and see if some tools don't need Acquisition to work properly.
>>> If I'm not mistaken this should let us remove all the manual AQ-
>>> again (sorry Jens for the premature patch) and thus impose no extra
>>> on add-on developers.
> The manual wrapping can be removed if we do use the special component
> registry which would do it for us, right. Having it done behind the
> scenes is obviously much better then trying to figure out if it's
> needed and then doing it manually. It's also the exact same behavior
> people got from getToolByName, so it's not really unexpected.
Even in Zope3, I think that "local" utilities may need to be local,
meaning that they know the "place" in which they are registered. In
Zope2, we *must* wrap them for the sake of security, if nothing else.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v188.8.131.52 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests