-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> 
> On 8 Jan 2007, at 01:19, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>> Right now I would let all existing CMF tools implement that interface,
>>> so we would be on the safe side. In a later release we can revisit  
>>> this
>>> and see if some tools don't need Acquisition to work properly.
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken this should let us remove all the manual AQ- 
>>> wrapping
>>> again (sorry Jens for the premature patch) and thus impose no extra  
>>> pain
>>> on add-on developers.
> 
> The manual wrapping can be removed if we do use the special component  
> registry which would do it for us, right. Having it done behind the  
> scenes is obviously much better then trying to figure out if it's  
> needed and then doing it manually. It's also the exact same behavior  
> people got from getToolByName, so it's not really unexpected.

Even in Zope3, I think that "local" utilities may need to be local,
meaning that they know the "place" in which they are registered.  In
Zope2, we *must* wrap them for the sake of security, if nothing else.


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 540-429-0999          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFombj+gerLs4ltQ4RAoQAAJ0TIjargP59yIXdW+59yEedPQwU7gCghQKv
4CichHH+qhX7WGGsdQlwukQ=
=5nIX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to