Jens Vagelpohl wrote:

I'm not convinced that anything which is this tightly coupled to Zope
needs to be a package, rather than a product.  I don't think the
"package zealots" get the fact that purity is not a win if we have to
distort the rest of the application to satisfy it.

Amen to that.

I guess you could argue that if it's fairly close to Zope 3, then it should follow Zope 3's conventions. :)


Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to