Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I'm not convinced that anything which is this tightly coupled to Zope
needs to be a package, rather than a product. I don't think the
"package zealots" get the fact that purity is not a win if we have to
distort the rest of the application to satisfy it.
Amen to that.
I guess you could argue that if it's fairly close to Zope 3, then it
should follow Zope 3's conventions. :)
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests