Previously Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> > My checkins today addressed at least the second change set you list by
> > making the site itself a utility and looking it up that way. The
> > additional wrapping is gone as well.
> I tested the branch again against the current Plone trunk and found no
> branch related problems, except one small glitch in our testing
> infrastructure which causes three tests to fail (it's missing the
> setSite() call somewhere). This can be easily fixed by us.
> I have already updated the current Plone trunk to set up a component
> registry based on five.localsitemanager and added the migration steps to
> register all the tools as utilities, as well as addding those to our
> base profile. So once the branch is merged at least Plone will work
> straight away.
> While my vote might not count much, I'd give a +1 to merging the branch
> and release a beta including it.

+1 here as well. The test runs do now reveal any problems aside from
what Hanno already mentioned and the result is a good improvement.


Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>    It is simple to make things.                   It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to