On Apr 19, 12:52 pm, Martin Aspeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  -1 to relying on five.localsitemanager, especially if it means other site
> managers somewhere inside the CMF site will need to be five.lsm aware.

Not sure what relying on five.lsm means... because if we don't use
five.lsm, then having sub-ISite's beneath a CMF site will break the
site due to the fact that current Five doesn't produce __bases__'s
properly.  This was the primary reason for doing five.lsm, to make
sure sub-ISite's work.

In effect, having a cmf portal be an ISite but not having a working
__bases__ actually does more harm than good.

- Rocky

Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to