I know I may be a bit pushy, but..
the weekend has come and gone, so I'm wondering if something has
Previously yuppie wrote:
> At the CMF-mini-sprint in Potsdam we decided to try to resolve most of
> the five.localsitemanager issues and to document the rest as known
> restrictions. (Each sitemanager used in CMF has to be a
> five.localsitemanager or a five.sitemanager.)
> The approach we tried at the sprint doesn't work - I just reverted those
> checkins. (Sorry for the noise on the trunk - a branch would have been
> better for experiments like that.)
> But we now have some more tests and a better understanding of how to
> make them pass. I plan to make an other attempt next weekend. If that
> isn't successful, I'm fine with reverting all the tools-as-utilities
> Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
> See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests