--On 18. Juli 2007 19:08:00 +0000 Maurits van Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andreas Jung, on 2007-07-18:I have an extension profile that works with Plone 3.0 (basically modifying = portal_skins and portal_actions). For Plone 2.5 compatibility my=20 actions.xml and skins.xml need to be different because the XML structure is = different between. What is the best approach for maintaining XML files for=20 both Plone 2.5 and Plone 3.0 in one profile (at least within the same source tree)?There might be some support for conditions in some of the xml files, but I am not aware of any.
For portal_skins you can keep skins.xml (for Plone 3.0) and skins_2.5.xml(for Plone 2.5) within the default profile. Since the meta_type for portal_skins differs between Plone 2.5 and Plone 3.0 GS seems to pick up the right one in both cases. Unfortunatly this is not the case for portal_actions where the meta_type is identical in both Plone versions and
at least the actions.xml (Plone 3.0) shadows actions_2.5.xml. -aj
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests