Laurence Rowe wrote:
Now I see why you didn't propose named adapters. But I'm still not
happy with adapting (IContentish, basestring). Did you consider to add
getId() to IWorkflowDefinition and to adapt (IContentish,
Then I don't see how you would register adapter for a specific (TTW or
generic setup defined) workflow.
Perhaps a named adapter lookup falling back to a plain adapter lookup is
the best solution?
All the solutions you propose to solve this look a bit like a hack to me
- I guess because you want to use adapters for something they are not
designed for. AFAICT the default pattern for adapting specific objects
is to use marker interfaces.
Why do we need a different solution for workflows?
(Sorry for not answering earlier.)
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests