-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC
> interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface
> explicitly dublicing CMFCore's version.
>
> Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
> classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly
> where possible?

Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code with  
other code to shift the maintenance burden"?

jens



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjZEaIACgkQRAx5nvEhZLIXggCfTlhL6W3aWonllp8ZteSLLnKb
T1UAoJlAkKXVLAX/A9aF6fJK1wYICjsu
=k4fA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to