-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sep 23, 2008, at 19:19 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>
>>> Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
>>> classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly
>>> where possible?
>>
>> Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code  
>> with
>> other code to shift the maintenance burden"?
>
> I found myself writing some code which needs to get dublin core data  
> from
> content and should work for both zope3 and zope2 applications, except
> for the difference in interfaces.

As you already found, the ICMFDublinCore should be supported by both,  
right?

jens


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkjZJrwACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLyQgCgrUojEKCwI6P5I8jvU4WNQbbr
ZI4AnjesKxD+A/GNmICYY3bqlp5UrdSk
=HDOn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to