-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sep 23, 2008, at 19:19 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>> On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>> Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived
>>> classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly
>>> where possible?
>> Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code
>> other code to shift the maintenance burden"?
> I found myself writing some code which needs to get dublin core data
> content and should work for both zope3 and zope2 applications, except
> for the difference in interfaces.
As you already found, the ICMFDublinCore should be supported by both,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests