yuppie wrote: > Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>> Why not a ++add++ traverser? Aren't traversed supposed to be used for >>> that kind of thing? Or does a view gives us something here that a >>> traverser doesn't? >> Namespace traversal adapters are similar to IPublishTraverse solutions. >> The difference is that the namespace traversal adapter normally returns >> something "containerish" from which traversal continues. I think it's >> intended mostly as a "redirect" to a different traversal namespace, e.g. >> in the way that plone.app.portlets has namespaces for portlet managers. > > I don't think a containerish return value is characteristic for > namespace adapters. For example the ++view++ traverser usually doesn't > return something containerish. > > I now implemented an ++add++ traverser in my sandbox and it seems to > work fine.
Cool. :) Let us know when it's checked in, I'd love to have a look at it! Cheers, Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
