Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2009-2-16 13:48 +0100:
> ...
>Does anyone else have a specific opinion for this case, disregarding  
>the five.localsitemanager discussion?

Dependancies should be as loose as possible.

  If a component uses "CMFDefault" but only indirectly "CMFCore",
  it should specify "CMFDefault" as a dependency but not "CMFCore".

  If it explicitely uses both "CMFDefault" as well as "CMFCore", specifying
  both may be more future proof.

Zope-CMF maillist  -

See for bug reports and feature requests

Reply via email to