Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2009-2-16 13:48 +0100: > ... >Does anyone else have a specific opinion for this case, disregarding >the five.localsitemanager discussion?
Dependancies should be as loose as possible. If a component uses "CMFDefault" but only indirectly "CMFCore", it should specify "CMFDefault" as a dependency but not "CMFCore". If it explicitely uses both "CMFDefault" as well as "CMFCore", specifying both may be more future proof. -- Dieter _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
