Jens Vagelpohl wrote at 2009-2-16 13:48 +0100:
>Does anyone else have a specific opinion for this case, disregarding
>the five.localsitemanager discussion?
Dependancies should be as loose as possible.
If a component uses "CMFDefault" but only indirectly "CMFCore",
it should specify "CMFDefault" as a dependency but not "CMFCore".
If it explicitely uses both "CMFDefault" as well as "CMFCore", specifying
both may be more future proof.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests