Previously yuppie wrote:
> It's no hook for adding restrictions, but it's a hook for using
> different implementations.
> > and does not support portal types.
> Do you mean "does not support per portal type hooks" or do you mean
> "does not support filtering based on portal type name"?
The latter. zope.* has no concept of FTIs or portal types.
> A CMF specific precondition would look up type restrictions in the fti
> of the container.
> checkFactory and checkObject are quite similar to isConstructionAllowed.
> I think we should reimplement this based on zope.container before we
> start adding new features.
I looked at the code in zope.container and frankly it scared me. I found
the documentation and code hard to follow, and the usage of
sys._getframe() made me drop the idea of using it.
Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests