On 7/1/10 11:37 , yuppie wrote: > Hi Tres! > > > Tres Seaver wrote: >>> Am 30.06.2010, 15:09 Uhr, schrieb Tres >>> Seaver<[email protected]>: >>> >>>> As a general rule, I would actually prefer that we strip out the >>>> keywords currently in the code -- they are CVS-era fossils which no >>>> longer add any value in the SVN + eggs world. > > Why are they "CVS-era fossils"? What special value did they add in the > CVS world? > > I always thought we use the Id keyword because CVS or SVN metadata is > not always available. In tarball or egg releases that kind of metadata > is missing.
FWIW I have never felt a need for that information inside a tarball or egg, and agree with Tres that they make generating diffs between trees needlessly difficult. > I would prefer if you would propose that on the zope-dev list. It > doesn't make sense to remove them in CMF and to keep them in ZTK or Zope > headers. And it doesn't make sense if just a few people remove them in a > few places and other people follow the old policy. I thought they already disappeared from most places by now. I'm can't remember seeing them for newly added code either. Wichert. _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
