At 12:50 PM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
>> At 11:09 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Patch opportunity, perhaps?  :)  Ty and I would do it, no problem.
>> >> I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since Zope
>> >> pay attention to anything past the first line of the "access" file...
>> >
>> >We would be most grateful! :-)
>> >
>> So are y'all at DC in agreement that this would be a useful feature with no
>> pitfalls?  Should we go through the new fishbowl process thing to do this?
>Some of the crew are at oscon this week so they'll have to answer when
>they get back.  But I am of the opinion that the fishbowl process is
>only needed for relatively major changes.  Small modifications can just
>be posted, reviewed, and merged.

Hm.  I don't think this could be classed as a "minor" change, however,
since it has impact on ownership, for example.  What's the path of the user
folder which is above "/", for example?  The whole thing is useless if
these extra users can't be owners, and the ownership machinery right now
wants an access path.  I think perhaps we should go the fishbowl route on
this, if only to make sure that Jim doesn't have a heart attack when he
gets back.  :)

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to