At 03:56 PM 9/14/00 +0100, Steve Alexander wrote:
>Can we lose DynPersist altogether for this release? 

Unfortunately, no.  Zope's cPersistent class appears it may have a bug that
is roughly similar to the one we're fixing in DynPersist.  (i.e., not
calling __of__ or other binding operations on an object returned from

I've written Jim to ask whether my interpretation of that code is correct,
but have not received a reply.  It may take a new Zope release before
DynPersist is able to go away.  :(

>Or are there still folks out there using ZPatterns with 2.1.6?

Support for 2.1.x was officially dropped with ZPatterns 0.4.2a1, but in
practice most of the support code is still there today.  It's just that
I've stopped testing on 2.1.x and no longer write code with 2.1.x
compatibility in mind.  The re-architecting of the transaction machinery
will *require* 2.2.x's transaction ordering semantics.

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to