Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Steve Alexander writes:
> > On my pie-in-the-sky zope wishlist:
> >
> > What I'd like is a new tab for zope objects that allows me to say which
> > protocols the object is accessible from, and what to do if not.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > access route accessible? action
> >
> > called from template yes
> > http on port 8080 no return 404
> > ftp yes
> >
> >
> > Another example:
> >
> > access route accessible? action
> >
> > called from template yes
> > http on port 8080 no redirect to URL
> Sounds good to me.
>
> With the exception that I do not like the explicit port references.
> I would like to see there an indirection (e.g. use a name
> which can be mapped to a port at a central place).
I agree, that's a good idea.
The accessible state, and the action for a particular access-route could
be acquired, like the current security settings. So, I'd have to say in
only a single folder's accessing tab that all objects below that folder
that are invisible to web traversal should return a 404.
Isn't there already a fishbowl proposal for this kind of thing? Did it
get anywhere?
--
Steve Alexander
Software Engineer
Cat-Box limited
http://www.cat-box.net
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )