> "Andy McKay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | The ideal solution would be to use an object that lives in the ZODB,
> > | I wonder if there is a way to keep the 'object history' empty?  That
> > | is, keeping the counter 'packed' while retaining 'object history'
> > | information on all other objects.
> That would work, however I just dont think that fits neatly into the ZODB in
> any way since all objects are appended.

Small confusion here:  "ZODB" is a higher-level abstraction than
"FileStorage";  it is quite feasible to have one or more storages
inside your Zope which are "packless" / "undo-less", and which
then have the space efficiencies you are looking for (often at a
non-trivial time cost).

Tres Seaver                                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Digital Creations     "Zope Dealers"       http://www.zope.org

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to