On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:09:10PM +0100, Chris Withers wrote:
> 1. When people using your site don't need to write to the ZODB to use the site
> (it sounds like they do in your case)
The users themselves do not write, but periodically an External Method
receives email via xml and parses it into a bunch of new Zope objects.
Would this cause trouble with Versions?
> 2. You don't use mounted storages. In particular, Core Session Tracking and
> Version objects seem to have quite a bad time of it when played with together,
> but it's understandable when you think about how CST works.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by mounted storage. The site
makes use of LocalFS--is this the kind of thing you are talking about?
> I find versions are generally useful when updating brochurewear (DTML Methods
> and Dcouments) but are limited elsewhere. It's a shame you can't use them with
> WebDAV (guessing here, somebody tell me I'm wrong ;-) or FTP without major
> hackory :-S
I'm curious how Versions failed for you when using mounted storage,
etc. Were you unable to roll back changes? Were changes you made
lost? Was your database corrupted?
--
Ed Goppelt
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
