I think using mxDateTime would be a great idea (it would mean DC would
no longer need to maintain our own DateTime module).  And since you've
done a lot of good work in creating a wrapper, we've got a head start. 
But I think before it can go in to any release, we need to follow the
fishbowl process.  This means creating a proposal on dev.zope.org,
letting Brian know about it, and then letting Brian choose if and when
he wants it to go in (it will subsequently be made into a project).


- C

Stephan Richter wrote:
> At 10:28 AM 6/7/01 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
> >Actually, it's good that the license is BSDish, that means that it's
> >legally possible to include mxDateTime inside a Zope distribution.
> Cool, so the license problem is definitely solved.
> Now, we just have to get rid of the last technical issues. From DC's point
> of view: Is there a chance, that this port to mxDateTime could make it into
> Zope 2.4? I think this would be the correct release in anyway, since there
> will be so many changes.
> Regards,
> Stephan
> --
> Stephan Richter
> CBU - Physics and Chemistry Student
> Web2k - Web Design/Development & Technical Project Management

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to