Would this approach be appropriate?
> From: "Ulrich Eck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:33:15 +0200
> To: "ZOPE-DEV Mailingliste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Zope-dev] Patching Zope Products .. next Question
>> can I do this with:
>> import Products.CMFCore.PortalContent
>> <<define myclass here >>
>> Products.CMFCore.PortalContent.PortalContent = <<myclass>>
> ok this works but there is another tricky thing now ...
> I need to patch two products: CMFCore and CMFDefault.
> first i patch CMFCore and I think this works (at least a portalfolder
> is a customizerfolder :)
> I have now 2 new Classes PortalFolder and PortalContent ..
> the CMFDefault.Document for example is still subclassed from
> CMFCore.PortalContent (the default) and therefore doesn't behave
> like a dataskin ..
> any ideas ?
> is the order in wich the modules are loaded known or changeable ??
> if this doesn't work .. I need to release the patches as diffs or tarballs
> replacing CMFDefault and Core .. not as nice as just patching them ..
> Ulrich Eck
> Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -