"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote:
> than the factor of 100 your numbers showed for you data!  I would not
> make the blanket assertion that Berkeley storage is 100 times slower
> than FileStorage.

Sorry, let me clarify as well, I only meant in the context of searching and indexing...

> Let me just reiterate: it's vitally important to tune your Berkeley
> storage for your system and application, especially with regards to
> cachesize.  E.g. Getting the cachesize wrong can definitely destroy
> your performance, maybe producing numbers as bad as you're seeing.
> I won't claim that Berkeley DB is easy to tune, though.

Indeed... and I've spent a while twiddling cache sizes to no avail ;-)



Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to