> I think the main reason for bad performance of any network related
> application under Cygwin is the network layer. My observation is
> that network is usually 10 to 25% of the normal throughput under Windows.
> I have also seen that Cgywin performs slower on Windows 2000  than on
> Windows ME.

Jupp, I think so too (about network performance).
As I understood, the whole thread started with an argument that perhaps 
no native zope port for windows is needed because of cygwin.
I would say, as Chris, for development, this is ok, for production
not, the quote from the apache site indicates this.
I doubt zope corp. would accept a 30% tradeoff on windows.

Ok, now let's discuss how feasible windows is for a production
server anyway ;-).


Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to