seb bacon wrote:
> I think the use cases driving synchronisation requirements are not yet
> sufficiently understood.  Agreed, it's a feature that many people need,
> but I get the impression it would be premature to include ZSyncer as is
> in Zope without more detailed planning.  On the other hand, there is an
> argument which says, ZSyncer is a good product used by a lot of people,
> let's put it in Zope and deal with any issues after the event.

Yeah... maybe we need a standard "Zope Expansion Kit" that is a cohesive 
package of products that aren't in the Zope core, but are officially 
sanctioned and versioned and released alongside versions of Zope.

Steve Alexander

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to