* Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020316 09:40]:
> I thought Shane was working on this in his 'better tracebacks' branch?
> The fact is that the tracebacks should _never_ be appended by some process
> outside standard_error_message.

granted. ;)

> If people want tracebacks, and there's _lots_ of different ways people want
> tracebacks, the should add them explicitly in standard_error_message. That
> said, the default standard_error_message may want to include the options you
> have above.

Yes. But actually (I took a look in the LoginManager code - and it seems as if he
is not directly guilty that the traceback shows up, when the login screen is 
raisen) having a commented traceback in all pages is better then having an 
&sect; dangling around, which actually makes applications unsellable. (I am currently
involved in a kind of competition between web application tools at my university, and 
want to let zope blink and shine in its best manner.)

> cheers,
> Chris - DWIM never does what you want ;-)

So it should be called IDWYM, otherwise it is right ... it does what it means ... ;)



Christian Theune - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh & co.kg - schalaunische strasse 6 - 06366 koethen/anhalt
tel.+49 3496 3099112 - fax.+49 3496 3099118 mob. - 0178 48 33 981

reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,[chr(ord(x)^42) for x in 'zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b'])

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to