Hi. * Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020316 09:40]: > I thought Shane was working on this in his 'better tracebacks' branch? > > The fact is that the tracebacks should _never_ be appended by some process > outside standard_error_message.
granted. ;) > > If people want tracebacks, and there's _lots_ of different ways people want > tracebacks, the should add them explicitly in standard_error_message. That > said, the default standard_error_message may want to include the options you > have above. Yes. But actually (I took a look in the LoginManager code - and it seems as if he is not directly guilty that the traceback shows up, when the login screen is raisen) having a commented traceback in all pages is better then having an uninfluencable § dangling around, which actually makes applications unsellable. (I am currently involved in a kind of competition between web application tools at my university, and i want to let zope blink and shine in its best manner.) > > cheers, > > Chris - DWIM never does what you want ;-) So it should be called IDWYM, otherwise it is right ... it does what it means ... ;) Greetings Christian -- Christian Theune - [EMAIL PROTECTED] gocept gmbh & co.kg - schalaunische strasse 6 - 06366 koethen/anhalt tel.+49 3496 3099112 - fax.+49 3496 3099118 mob. - 0178 48 33 981 reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,[chr(ord(x)^42) for x in 'zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b']) _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )