From: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> I propose that we could add a new "field type" with a name
> like optional_date. The converter handler for that type could
> handle an empty field in whatever way we feel is reasonable,
> without breaking existing applications. (Let the fight over
> "reasonable" begin! :^)

That's fine by me. And reasonable would be '', since otherwise it really
isn't optional. :-) OK, I could accept that None would work too, but ''
*has* to work. You can't force end-users to enter magick cookies.

I'd also be interested on you take on issue #171, returning empty lists...

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to