From: "Brian Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I propose that we could add a new "field type" with a name > like optional_date. The converter handler for that type could > handle an empty field in whatever way we feel is reasonable, > without breaking existing applications. (Let the fight over > "reasonable" begin! :^)
That's fine by me. And reasonable would be '', since otherwise it really isn't optional. :-) OK, I could accept that None would work too, but '' *has* to work. You can't force end-users to enter magick cookies. I'd also be interested on you take on issue #171, returning empty lists... _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
