On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 08:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How extensively is STX actually used? I've been looking at it myself > recently, and the whole system seem rather simplistic to me in how it > parses the text. I'm talking specifically of the STX version currently > standard in Zope 2.5 (and 2.4 I think), which I believe is STXNG; > > [snip] > > I explain the problems I see next, followed by a proposed algorithm > change and some rough code to make things "better".
Please also see the ReStructureText effort which addresses a lot of the problems that STXNG is perceived to have. It's really very nice, and one of these days I hope to get it wrapped in a Zope Product. http://structuredtext.sf.net/ Note specifically: http://structuredtext.sourceforge.net/spec/problems.txt If something you see as being a problem in STXNG isn't addressed there, I'm sure the author of ReST would love to hear about it! Richard _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
