> I think that there is at least potential value in sharing lexicons. > Of course, a down side is that it complicates set up.
This is where I say "YAGNI" and announce that I'll be happy to refactor the code if and when a real need is discovered. > On the subject of referencing lexicons by path rather than using > direct references, I'm inclined to agree that direct references are > better for simplicity and speed. It's easy enough to add a new index > when you want to change a lexicon. (Well, there are some > complications having to do with making sure that you get all the > needed data into the new index...) What was the use case for switching lexicons in the first place? I bet it was just someone idly playing around and noticing that it didn't work right... --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )