> I agree. Is there any reason for ZODB to actually keep timestamps rather
> than just use serial version ids?

Most storages need a timestamp anyway for time-related packing.

> (I understand calls to get the system tiem are expensive, incrementing an
> integer number by one should be somewhat less expensive...)

No more expensive than any other OS call. ZODB currently uses only a few calls 
to time() per transaction, so there is little to be saved.

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to