On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:32:59 -0700 Jeffrey P Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Advertising
> On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 04:22 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > > > Ross J. Reedstrom wrote: > >> It what world do you live, and can I move there? > > > > You miss the point ;-) > > > > The flurry to get features into a 'stable' release is what I was on > > about. > > If you flurry, the release won't be stable. > > > > I like the pattern of having stable releases and CVS or nightly builds > > for people who want the latest and greatest. That way everyone gets to > > contribute easily and freely and yet we still get truly stable > > versions. > > > > Maybe not to the extent of having seperate 'dev' and 'stable' streams > > a la Linux, but that's a good feeling in essence. > > > > Still, the overarching thing is release early and often. The fewer > > features in each release, the fewer problems of "I need this feature, > > but that means I also have to accept this one that I don't trust" > > But release often is a BITCH for software configuration management. > Good for developers, bad for deployers. Hence the nightly build. Just for developers or early adopters. Not for deployers. -Casey _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
