On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 23:02, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
> i personally don't see a way to completely avoid ZODB bloat with a 
> counter product stored in the ZODB itself. IMHO it is inherently bad to 
> use ZODB-based hit counters in general for that very reason.

Just an idea from the 'could-be-done-if-needed-department'. Generally
there is quite often the need to have non-undoable properties in
different objects of a site. There is one way to store it in the
temporary storage, which is ram based, and not shared between ZEO
instances. But if a second non-undoable storage is mounted it could be
stored there and could be shared between ZEOC.

To make this more transparent, one could perhaps implement something
like a special propertysheetobject, which stores its properties in this
mounted storage. 

Is there anything obviously wrong with this idea?


Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to