On Tuesday 11 February 2003 5:21 pm, Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 12:10, Shane Hathaway wrote:

> I'd like to do the transaction states, because it would keep the code in
> zodb3 and zodb4 similar. 

There are application-level reasons to mark a transaction as doomed, and I 
would like to keep *that* code looking similar ;-). The transaction states 
approach would work in that context too, right?

Toby Dickenson

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to