I hear only crickets. I said we can avoid nearly all conflicts in sessions. Does this not interest anyone?

Shane Hathaway wrote:
A while ago I experimented with ways to prevent conflict errors from reaching the application. ZODB has matured since then and it should now be possible to make a Connection class that resolves conflicts internally rather than propagate them to the application--as long as the application follows certain rules. Should we consider finishing that effort?

Relevant URLs:

http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/zodbex/zodbex/Shield
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/ArmoredCatalog


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to