It interests me! ;-)  I haven't had time to look at the resources you
posted, though... 

Dieter also sent me a different transient object container
implementation before which has better conflict avoidance.  I have not
been able to look at that either. :-(


(We either need an internal project to fail miserably due to conflict
errors, or I need to stop playing MechAssault on the Xbox so much after
work and get back to coding after work. ;-)

- C

On Fri, 2003-05-30 at 10:06, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> I hear only crickets.  I said we can avoid nearly all conflicts in 
> sessions.  Does this not interest anyone?
> Shane Hathaway wrote:
> > A while ago I experimented with ways to prevent conflict errors from 
> > reaching the application.  ZODB has matured since then and it should now 
> > be possible to make a Connection class that resolves conflicts 
> > internally rather than propagate them to the application--as long as the 
> > application follows certain rules.  Should we consider finishing that 
> > effort?
> > 
> > Relevant URLs:
> > 
> >
> >

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to