>>> "Tim Peters" wrote > Jeremy and I saw cases of ring corruption while putting together the > experimental ZODB 3.3, but they were 100% reproducible on all platforms, and > turned out to have clear causes (some of the C objects we backported from > ZODB4 were getting ghostified by the ZODB4 code without removing themselves > from the ZODB3 ring). So "ring corruption" rang a bell for me, but not one > that makes any sense in your context. > > Keep your eyes open, Anthony! If it happens again, I want to know.
One thing that might be worthwhile is to move the MUCH_RING_CHECKING code from cPickleCache.c into a common file, and use it in cPersistence.c as well as cPickleCache.c. The latter wasn't seeing the corruption at all, while the former was. If this seems like a good idea I'm happy to make the change. Anthony _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
