On Wednesday 15 October 2003 12:47, Chris Withers wrote:
> Casey Duncan wrote:
> > I would argue that a better plan would be to only use _v_ vars for
> > completely disposable data only. The application should expect that this
> > values will be gone at any random time, not just at transaction
> > boundaries.
> Agreed. Are there any situations, apart from the already discussed CMF
> skindata, where this currently isn't the case?

every database adapter?

(I guess, but havent checked)

Toby Dickenson

Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to