On Wednesday 15 October 2003 12:47, Chris Withers wrote: > Casey Duncan wrote: > > I would argue that a better plan would be to only use _v_ vars for > > completely disposable data only. The application should expect that this > > values will be gone at any random time, not just at transaction > > boundaries. > > Agreed. Are there any situations, apart from the already discussed CMF > skindata, where this currently isn't the case?
every database adapter? (I guess, but havent checked) -- Toby Dickenson _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
