Toby Dickenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday 22 April 2004 10:42, Syver Enstad wrote: > > I've used the cache_size paramter to the constructor of the DB to good > > effect. Are there any further gotchas for ensuring that the ZODB stays > > in memory as much as possible? > > Memory usage scales proportional to the number of threads. Reducing the > number of worker threads lets you increase the per-thread cache size.
I don't use connection per thread semantics but I think I understand what you mean. I should pass a lower number than the default to the pool_size keyword argument for the DB constructor? What about the other arguments to the DB constructor? cache_deactivate_after sounds interesting. Since I am running ZODB in a web server I don't want the data to timeout and disappear from memory since every object I have should be loaded at all times. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
