> > There are a significant and growing number of people in group B.
> Yup, that makes sense. Are these assumed to also be the
> folks who will
> try to make sure that new Z3 releases make it in to Z2 via Five? I
> guess what I'm driving at is that I'd hate to eventually have
> a very old version of Z3 sitting inside of Zope 2 due to insufficient
> bandwidth on the part of those developers to keep up with Z3 releases.
> While it wouldn't be the end of the world or anything, I suspect some
> dependencies will inevitably creep into the Zope 2 core on Zope 3
> packages, and maintaining an older codebase can be pretty
> painful. The testing requirements for making sure that changes that Z2
> coders make to Z3 work both in Z2 and Z3 is a pretty high bar, just as
> vice versa. In the past, I've seen efforts like this turn into an
> effective fork as a result.
It won't turn into a fork. Right now there is a lot of discussion
going on about the 'right' way to manage Z3 releases -- we'll need
to decide on a Z2 release policy that takes that into account. I
think the goal for Z2 will be to include the latest stable z3
possible. Some have suggested synchronizing the releases - that
may be the way to go if it isnt impractical from an operational
point of view.
In any case, the goal is to gradually (but consistently!) make
more and more Z3 functionality available to Z2 developers in
future Z2 releases, based on the most stable Z3 baseline possible.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong here but I get the sense that Five is
> less of a "migration path" from Z2 to Z3 than a way to integrate Z3
> technologies (like views and adapters) into Z2 right now. Obviously
> allowing Z2 developers to use these things will give them a
> some needed
> familiarity with Z3 if they decide to switch but the migration path to
> "straight Z3" will always be more or less a rewrite, no?
It is definitely a migration path. Lets say you have an application based
on Z3 with 10 (logical) components. You couldn't feasibly rewrite all of
it at once to use Z3. As of 2.8, you'll be able to add functionality to
your application using adapters, views, etc. So for V.Next of your app,
maybe you are able to port 2 existing components and add 1 new one. For
V.Next.Next, you add 2 more and port 2 more. At some point, it *will*
be feasible to jump to Z3 with a minmal effort, since you've been able
to port your application to components over time.
> > I *do* expect these (good) questions to recur in future Z2
> > releases, as integration and ability to use Z3 technologies
> > increases, but we'll have plenty of time to work those out.
> > For now, I think it is a huge win to make some Z3 avenues
> > available to people who want to use them, without forcing
> > everyone to drink the kool-aid at once ;)
> Yup... I'm still a bit skeptical but if other folks are committed to
> maintenance I'd be less so.
Skepticism is healthy, but if it's any consolation, almost everyone
involved in this effort has very real 'skin in the game' in terms
of existing Zope2 investments. I think that will do a great deal
to ensure that the decisions made for future 2.x work are sane and
take real-world concerns into account.
Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V.P. Engineering 540.361.1716
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -