Evan Simpson wrote:
Christian Heimes wrote:

That's an interessting use case. Do you want me to keep the code and make up a new expression? I'm thinking about "lazy:".

If you have a particular use for "defer:" that would justify the split, please go ahead. I have no particular interest in keeping it.

I left defer: like it was coded by you and added a new expression lazy: that is working like a lazy initialization variable.


Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to