> > Just an idea:
> > One thing that would be interesting and increase the Z3 compatibility
> > is to use traversing adapters, and then, of course, make a default
> > adapter that implements Zope2 traversing for objects that does not
> > have a traversing adapter.
> > Stupid or brilliant? :)
> I know Florent had some ideas of doing this integration too. It's an
> interesting idea.
> That said, I don't think we should add this to Zope 2.9, unless a
> developer gets really enthusiastic in the near future and takes
> responsibility for this.
My idea was to do a big cleanup of Zope 2's traversal mechanisms. The
problem is that it will by necessity get rid some of the idiosyncrasies
(read: cruft and incoherences) of the current one, and in the process
probably break stuff. Which means it has to be optional, which adds even
more complexity to the code :( So in the end the realities of backward
compatibility are a big hurdle.
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France) CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59 http://nuxeo.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -