Dylan Jay  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tres Seaver wrote:
> > Hash: SHA1
> > Chris' ClockServer removes the need for such a thread, by hooking
> > ZServer's mainloop to generate the "faux" request needed to kick off
> > async processing.  A "crontab" - like schedule can be driven equally
> > well from ClockScheduler as from a separate thread.
> So what's wrong with including ClockServer in the core or making it 
> easier to install? (ie not having to put packages in the python path 
> which is hard with some hosting arrangements)
> And what's the argument against a core scheduler regardless of a clock? 
> Isn't running background tasks a common need amoungst many very 
> different tools and therefore a interstructure issue?

Myself I'm for having ClockServer in the core, if Chris and others agree.


Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)   CTO, Director of R&D
+33 1 40 33 71 59   http://nuxeo.com   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to