On 2/28/06, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the other major point is the "door #2" proposal takes pressure > off of Zope3: under that regime, Zope3 does not need to grow all the > features present in Zope2, which door #1 *does* imply.
I still would like to know wich these missing features are. Unless it's TTW development, which, as mentioned, I think should be viewed as a separate set of packages. Most Zope3 developers do not want or need it. -- Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/ CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/ _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
